Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 477 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Single-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2406mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Apple iPhone 13 mini, having a score of 91.3 against 73. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with Android 12 OS, and Apple iPhone 13 mini has iOS OS. The Apple iPhone 13 mini features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
Apple iPhone 13 mini has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Galaxy A52 5G features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 mini, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 13 mini, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 mini, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2406mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.