Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| -- | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| -- | 9.56 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 477 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Single-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| -- | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2406mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Apple iPhone 13 mini, having a overall score of 90.6 against 73. Galaxy Z Fold 3 works with Android 11 OS, and Apple iPhone 13 mini comes with iOS OS. IPhone 13 mini counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 mini, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit faster processor than iPhone 13 mini, because although it has a 32-bits CPU instead of 64-bits, it also counts with a higher number of cores (although they are slower).
The iPhone 13 mini takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 MP resolution, the iPhone 13 mini also has a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone 13 mini, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2406mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.