Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than Google Pixel 2, getting a global score of 93.2 against 81.6. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's design is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner, but noticeably heavier than Google Pixel 2. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a more powerful processor than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 2 lesser cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of display, a lot larger screen and a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser MP resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The Google Pixel 2's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as iPhone 13 Pro Max's one, both have the same internal memory. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 2, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.