Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Aurora black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is better than LG V50 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 93.2 against 83.7. IPhone 13 Pro Max's design is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner than LG V50 ThinQ's, although it is also much heavier. IPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while LG V50 ThinQ works with Android 10 OS.
LG V50 ThinQ features a screen that is very similar to Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's screen, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bit better display density. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a quite superior performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lesser cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max. Both of them have a 12 MP back-facing camera, the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition. LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V50 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can get LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.