Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 457 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32's general score of 84.7. The iPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system. Even though the iPhone 13 Pro Max and Galaxy A32 were only released with a couple of months difference, the iPhone 13 Pro Max construction is thinner but heavier.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64 bits CPU. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a lot more pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher 1284 x 2778 resolution and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and video in low-light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a bit better battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.