Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a 93.2 score against 81. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro works with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS. IPhone 13 Pro Max's construction is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's a lot heavier and just a little thicker.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a better 1284 x 2778 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a just a bit greater screen density. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a slightly better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has just a little better battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4352mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.