Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 15.x | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.71 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 93.2 against 77.8. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a incredibly older, just a little bit heavier and thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 OS.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 10 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a bit worse pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with greater battery life than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 31% larger battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.