Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with a overall score of 93.3 against 81. The iPhone 13 Pro body is a lot newer than Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's just a little heavier and a little thicker. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy C9 Pro counts with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS.
IPhone 13 Pro features a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch of screen. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
IPhone 13 Pro features a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a much larger camera aperture to capture better low light images.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has longer battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 29% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.