Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note9, with a 93.3 score against 87.1. The iPhone 13 Pro is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner device than Samsung Galaxy Note9, although it is just a bit heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note9, although it has a little worse resolution of 1170 x 2532px, a just a bit lower amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little smaller display. Samsung Galaxy Note9 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro. Both of them have the same 60 fps video frame rates, a 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, the same aperture and the same video resolution.
The Galaxy Note9 has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy Note9 features longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3095mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy Note9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy Note9. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy Note9, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.