Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 is better than the Google Pixel 2, getting a score of 91.5 against 81.6. IPhone 13's design is a lot newer and just a bit thinner, but heavier than Google Pixel 2. The Apple iPhone 13 counts with a superior processor than Google Pixel 2, because although it has lesser cpu cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 13 also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone 13 counts with a much better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little bit better pixel density, a higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a larger display. The Google Pixel 2 counts with as much memory for applications and games as the iPhone 13 one, both of them have the same internal storage.
Apple iPhone 13 counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations. Apple iPhone 13 has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 2, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.