Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android |
| 2022-09-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 460 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.33 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro Max has an overall score of 94.9, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A32's global score of 84.7. IPhone 14 Pro Max has iOS 16.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS. The iPhone 14 Pro Max design is newer and thinner, but heavier than Samsung Galaxy A32.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a much greater pixel number per display inch, a quite larger display and a much better resolution of 1290 x 2796px. Samsung Galaxy A32 has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a more powerful processor than Galaxy A32, because although it has 2 less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a bit better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.