Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has an overall score of 94.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy M31s's overall score of 88. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max construction is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Galaxy M31s. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has iOS 16.x OS, while Galaxy M31s counts with Android 11 OS.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a superior processor than Galaxy M31s, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 14 Pro Max has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M31s, because it has a bit higher amount of pixels per screen inch, a little higher 1290 x 2796px resolution and a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s takes a bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy M31s has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M31s also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M31s has a very superior battery performance than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has a 39% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.