Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 16.x | Android 14 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.8 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has an overall score of 94.9, which is a lot better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Even though the iPhone 14 Pro Max is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it must be told that it's also an older, just a little bit heavier and thicker cellphone. The iPhone 14 Pro Max has iOS 16.x OS, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 OS.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and less processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with longer battery life than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations, a better resolution camera and a much higher video definition.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.