Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 16.x | Android 14 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight and Purple Starlight | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.71 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3279mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a score of 92.5 against 77.8. IPhone 14's construction is noticeably lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is a lot thicker and was released just 19 months before. IPhone 14 works with iOS 16.x operating system, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with Android 14 operating system.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Apple iPhone 14, because although it has a little worse number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a lot bigger display, a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and way more brightness. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 14, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Apple iPhone 14 features an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery performance than iPhone 14, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better videos and photos than iPhone 14, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Apple iPhone 14 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.