Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 8.x, 7.x | -- |
| 2013-09-10 | 2017-06-29 |
| 4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Polycarbonate | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 640 x 1136 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Swift (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1016 MB (1066 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 543MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 33.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1507mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play is better than the iPhone 5c, with a overall score of 77.4 against 70. The Moto Z2 Play construction is a lot newer and incredibly thinner than the iPhone 5c's, but it is also a little heavier. Moto Z2 Play has a better performance than iPhone 5c, because it has more RAM memory and 6 more processing cores.
IPhone 5c counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a way worse resolution of 1136 x 640 pixels and a much smaller display. The Moto Z2 Play takes better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 5c, because it has a much bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 5c, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 5c, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto Z2 Play not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.