Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 8.x, 7.x | -- |
| 2013-09-10 | 2018-05-22 |
| 4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Polycarbonate | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 640 x 1136 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A6 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Swift (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1016 MB (1066 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 543MP3 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 33.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1507mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 has a score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone 5c's 70 score. Galaxy A6's body is way newer and somewhat thinner than the Apple iPhone 5c's, although it is somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone 5c counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1136 x 640px, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel number per screen inch.
The Galaxy A6 has a little bit better processing power than iPhone 5c, because it has 2,01 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A6 takes much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone 5c, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also has a much more mega pixels back facing camera, a way larger aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy A6 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 5c, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A6 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy A6 counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone 5c, because it has a 99 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy A6 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.