Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-09-09 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black and Gold |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 625.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL1022 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s Plus has a global score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 general score. Even being the best in this comparison review, iPhone 6s Plus is an older, just a little bit heavier and a little thicker device than Galaxy C9 Pro. The iPhone 6s Plus counts with iOS 9.x OS, while Galaxy C9 Pro comes with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the Apple iPhone 6s Plus also counts with a quite higher pixels amount per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Apple iPhone 6s Plus counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits CPU. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a much better battery duration than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 45% greater battery capacity.
The iPhone 6s Plus takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture and a much less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.