Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 9.x | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black and White |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 625.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL1022 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.72 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus has a global score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Although the Apple iPhone 6s Plus is incredibly older and incredibly thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. The Apple iPhone 6s Plus comes with iOS 9.x operating system, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 operating system.
The iPhone 6s Plus counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better screen than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a lot brighter display, a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a lot bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better photos and videos than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a lot larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography, a much higher video definition and a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery duration than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the iPhone 6s Plus is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.