Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 9.x | -- |
| 2015-09-09 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 575.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than iPhone 6s's score of 83. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than iPhone 6s. The iPhone 6s has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it has a little bit inferior pixel count per inch in the display, a way smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 1334 x 750px, they both have the same screen brightness.
The iPhone 6s has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a lower number of cores and 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a graphics co-processor. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone 6s, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 1715mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.