Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-09-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 969.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 Plus has a global score of 83.8, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Even being the best phone in this comparison, iPhone 7 Plus is a just a bit thicker and heavier phone than Moto Z Force. The Apple iPhone 7 Plus and the Moto Z Force count with similar screens, and although the Moto Z Force has more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, they both have a display of the same size.
The iPhone 7 Plus features a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Force, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 7 Plus, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features better battery performance than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity. Motorola Moto Z Force captures just a bit better pictures and videos than iPhone 7 Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Although iPhone 7 Plus is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 7 Plus, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.