Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-09-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 969.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 7 Plus has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. IPhone 7 Plus is an way older phone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it is noticeably thinner and notably lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful processor than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Apple iPhone 7 Plus has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor offering a lower image quality and a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have a 12 MP resolution back facing camera, the Apple iPhone 7 Plus also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality.
Apple iPhone 7 Plus features a better memory for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the iPhone 7 Plus is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.