Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 969.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 7 Plus has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. The Apple iPhone 7 Plus is an extremely older phone than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it is somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone 7 Plus has a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a just a bit lower screen density, a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little smaller display.
The iPhone 7 Plus features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro's processor is just as good as the Apple iPhone 7 Plus one, although the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (although slower).
The Galaxy XCover Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, because although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger aperture to take better images in low-light environments and a much higher resolution camera.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 7 Plus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy XCover Pro. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy XCover Pro, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.