Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 969.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone 7 Plus, getting a overall score of 90.6 against 83.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is notably newer and thinner than Apple iPhone 7 Plus's, but it's notably heavier. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better processor than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
IPhone 7 Plus features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Apple iPhone 7 Plus, they have the same internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh. Apple iPhone 7 Plus counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Apple iPhone 7 Plus also has a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.