Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.84 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 81.6 score against 77.8. Even though iPhone 7 is incredibly older and way thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still way lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than iPhone 7, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480px resolution, a greater display density, a really brighter screen and a really larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 7, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 7 features a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 14 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster).
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 7, because it has a 191% bigger battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than iPhone 7, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a camera with a way higher resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Apple iPhone 7 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.