Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50's general score of 81.2. The iPhone 8 Plus design is just a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 50, although it's somewhat heavier and was released many years before. IPhone 8 Plus features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 has a bit more vivid screen than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a just a bit better amount of pixels in each inch in the screen, a better 1220 x 2712 resolution, a bigger screen and a really brighter display. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better camera than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Motorola Edge 50's memory to store more apps and games is very similar to Apple iPhone 8 Plus's one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has an 86% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.