Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-22 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 949.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 score. Despite being the best phone in this review, the iPhone 8 Plus design is older, a little thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto Z4. IPhone 8 Plus features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z4, although it has a bit lower display density, a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a little bit smaller display.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus features a superior hardware performance than Moto Z4, because although it has less CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a superior camera than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera, a bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited situations and a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Moto Z4 has a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 34 percent larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z4. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto Z4, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.