Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 79.9. Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is older and a little bit heavier than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a bigger screen, a much better 1440 x 3216px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
OPPO Find X3 Pro's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as Apple iPhone 8 Plus's one, they have the same 256 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has lesser and slower processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a much better camera than iPhone 8 Plus, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.