Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than the Moto G Power, having an 85 score against 76.1. IPhone 8's construction is incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter than Moto G Power, although it was released many years before. The iPhone 8 counts with a greater performance than Moto G Power, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 8 has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power, although it has a lot lower resolution of 750 x 1334px, a little worse pixel density and a way smaller display. IPhone 8 features more storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G Power, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 8 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality photographs and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G Power. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Power, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.