Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a overall score of 85 against 79.8. Despite of the fact that Apple iPhone 8 is much older than Motorola One Hyper, it's construction is incredibly lighter and thinner. The iPhone 8 counts with a better processor than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 8 features a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334px, a much smaller screen and a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola One Hyper features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh. Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola One Hyper, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.