Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 overall score. Even though Apple iPhone 8 is older than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's body is lighter and incredibly thinner. The iPhone 8 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a way lower 750 x 1334 pixels resolution, a little worse pixels density and a way smaller display.
IPhone 8 has a very superior performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has 2 less cores and 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Apple iPhone 8 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone 8 also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.