Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is slightly better than the Apple iPhone 8, having an 85.6 score against 85. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 body is way newer and a little thinner than the Apple iPhone 8's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a way larger display, more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Apple iPhone 8 features a little better processing power than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 6 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 8 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has more internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 8 captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and a 12 MP resolution back camera. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has an 81% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is more expensive than the Apple iPhone 8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Apple iPhone 8. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Apple iPhone 8, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.