Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 general score. IPhone 8's construction is way lighter and way thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M3, although it was released 3 years before. IPhone 8 features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M3, although it has a quite worse number of pixels per inch in the screen, a way lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a really smaller display.
The iPhone 8 has a bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The iPhone 8 has a better performing processor than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a slightly better camera than iPhone 8, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a way better battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 229% larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 8, else you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Poco M3, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.