Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-24 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2020) is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, having a score of 81.5 against 81. IPhone SE (2020) comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro works with Android 6.0 Marshmallow operating system. Even though the iPhone SE (2020) is just a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it's noticeably lighter and way newer.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) features a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 lesser processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor. IPhone SE (2020) has a bit better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a way worse 750 x 1334 pixels resolution, a much smaller display and a just a little worse pixels density.
IPhone SE (2020) features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments. Galaxy C9 Pro has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 120% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.