Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2020) has a score of 81.5, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. IPhone SE (2020) is a much older and notably thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Apple was able to make it a lot lighter anyway. The iPhone SE (2020) has iOS 15.x operating system, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 operating system.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a lot brighter screen, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a lot larger display. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 13 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and videos, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way higher resolution back camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery life than iPhone SE (2020), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
The iPhone SE (2020) not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.