Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-03-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, with an 86.6 score against 78.8. Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a notably newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 3a. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Google Pixel 3a counts with Android 11 operating system.
IPhone SE (2022) features a superior processor than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Google Pixel 3a and iPhone SE (2022) both count with really similar displays, although the Google Pixel 3a also has a bigger display, a lot better 1080 x 2220 resolution and a greater pixel density.
Google Pixel 3a counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as the iPhone SE (2022), they have equal internal storage. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lower resolution camera in the back, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone SE (2022), else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.