Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) has an overall score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's overall score of 81. IPhone SE (2022) comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover Pro counts with Android 11 operating system. The iPhone SE (2022) design is noticeably newer, noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro.
The iPhone SE (2022) has a better performing CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone SE (2022) has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a lot smaller screen, a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a lot lower 750 x 1334px resolution.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot lower resolution back-facing camera and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy XCover Pro has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a way better battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 101 percent more battery capacity.
IPhone SE (2022) is a little more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.