Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has an overall score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than Apple iPhone SE's score of 75.7. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Motorola Droid Turbo is an older, incredibly thicker and notably heavier phone than the Apple iPhone SE. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a more powerful processor than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a graphics processing unit, 1 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster).
Motorola Droid Turbo has an incredibly better looking display than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, a larger screen and a way greater screen pixels density. The Apple iPhone SE has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone SE, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a lot higher 20.7 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone SE, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola Droid Turbo is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.