Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone SE, having a 77.9 score against 75.7. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo body is older, extremely heavier and much thicker than Apple iPhone SE. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a quite better processing power than iPhone SE, because it has a larger number of cores , a greater amount of RAM and an extra GPU.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a way better looking display than iPhone SE, because it has a bigger display, a way higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of screen. IPhone SE counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much longer battery duration than iPhone SE, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 1624mAh. Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better camera than iPhone SE, because although it has slower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.