Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-03-31 | 2017-02-24 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than Apple iPhone SE's 75.7 overall score. Even though the Galaxy C9 Pro is notably heavier than Apple iPhone SE, it's a little bit thinner and newer. Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit faster processor than Apple iPhone SE, because it has more processing cores and 4 GB more RAM.
The Apple iPhone SE has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a way worse 640 x 1136 resolution, a way smaller display and a bit lower pixel density. IPhone SE has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures in low light environments and a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone SE, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a superior battery life than iPhone SE, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 1624mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.