Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2024-04-03 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Apple iPhone SE, getting a 77.8 score against 75.7. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a much newer and a lot thinner cellphone than the Apple iPhone SE, but it is also noticeably heavier. Apple iPhone SE features a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster) and 14 GB lesser RAM memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than iPhone SE, because it has a greater pixel density, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, much more brightness and a much larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone SE, because it has more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Apple iPhone SE, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than iPhone SE, because it has a back camera with way more MP, a lot better video resolution, a lot larger aperture to take better photos in low light situations and a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the iPhone SE, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as iPhone SE. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get iPhone SE, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.