Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2016-03-31 | 2018-08-29 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than iPhone SE, having an 85.5 score against 75.7. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is a lot newer than the iPhone SE's, although it's much heavier and somewhat thicker. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better looking screen than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same display brightness, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2246px, a lot bigger display and a just a little greater pixel density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone SE, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a faster CPU than iPhone SE, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior battery lifetime than iPhone SE, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better camera than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same resolution camera and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments, a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.