Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2017-11-03 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P, getting an 88.1 score against 80.3. Although the Apple iPhone X is just a bit thicker than the Google Nexus 6P, it's a little lighter and also much newer. The iPhone X counts with a better CPU than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone X counts with a bit sharper display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit worse 1125 x 2436px resolution and a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display. IPhone X captures a bit better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse video resolution, a lesser megapixels camera and a way tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting much worse quality images and videos, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations.
The Apple iPhone X features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Google Nexus 6P features superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Nexus 6P. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Nexus 6P, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.