Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2017-11-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than Google Pixel 2, with a global score of 88.1 against 81.6. The Apple iPhone X body is heavier but a little thinner than the Google Pixel 2, and both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. IPhone X has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone X counts with a little bit better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution, a little better count of pixels per display inch and a bigger screen. IPhone X shoots slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, a worse (4K) video definition and a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, they both have a same size aperture.
Apple iPhone X features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal storage. IPhone X has just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 2716mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 2. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 2, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.