Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2017-11-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.17 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than the Google Pixel XL, with a overall score of 88.1 against 81.3. Apple iPhone X is a newer and somewhat thinner device than the Google Pixel XL, although it is a little bit heavier. IPhone X features a superior hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a greater number of faster cores.
IPhone X counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Apple iPhone X counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel XL has longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. The Apple iPhone X has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lot smaller sensor which offers a lot lower image and video quality, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
IPhone X costs more than the Google Pixel XL, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.