Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Aurora black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's global score of 83.7. Although iPhone X is older than the LG V50 ThinQ, it's construction is just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner. The iPhone X has a slightly better display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a quite smaller display, a way worse 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little less pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone X has a little faster processing unit than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has 2 less and slower cores and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh. The LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 60 fps video frame rate and a same resolution back-facing camera, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a bigger sensor shooting better quality photographs and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V50 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V50 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.