Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 88.1 score against 76.4. The iPhone X is a much newer cellphone, and it's also extremely thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. The iPhone X features a little better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone X also counts with more cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little sharper display than iPhone X, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a just a little greater number of pixels per inch of display. Apple iPhone X has a superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Apple iPhone X captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lower video definition and a camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.