Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 88.1 score against 77.9. The iPhone X body is much newer, a bit lighter and way thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. The Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a greater number of cores and a 64-bit CPU.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a bit better looking screen than iPhone X, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels count per display inch and a bit higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The iPhone X takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Apple iPhone X features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.