Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 score. IPhone X's construction is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 50, despite of the fact that it was released 7 years before. Motorola Edge 50 has a slightly better screen than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a bit lower pixels quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a much brighter display.
Motorola Edge 50's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the iPhone X one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. IPhone X features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 5 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a lot larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.