Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Mystic indigo |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, with an 88.1 score against 79.7. Apple iPhone X is an noticeably older cellphone than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but Apple could make it somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. Apple iPhone X features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little better number of pixels per screen inch.
Apple iPhone X counts with a quite better performance than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Motorola Moto G Stylus takes much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos.
The Moto G Stylus has a little bit more memory for apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 47% more battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Stylus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Stylus, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.