Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Gray and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than the Motorola Moto Z4, getting a general score of 88.1 against 79.8. Even being the best in this review, iPhone X's body is older, just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto Z4. The Apple iPhone X features a brighter screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
Motorola Moto Z4 features slightly more memory for applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Apple iPhone X features a superior processor than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has 2 less processing cores and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Motorola Moto Z4 has improved battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh. Moto Z4 features a much better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto Z4 also counts with a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z4. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto Z4, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.